Understanding the Difference
Different approaches, different outcomes
Not all legal assistance is structured the same way. This page sets out, clearly and without bias toward either, the differences between a focused advisory practice and a general-scope law firm.
Return to HomeWhy the Distinction Matters
When a company or individual needs legal assistance, there are broadly two types of service available: a general-practice firm handling a wide range of matters, and a more focused practice that works within defined areas. Neither is incorrect as a choice — the question is which is suited to the matter at hand.
Sekihi operates within civil, corporate and property law. This means enquiries in these areas receive a response from someone whose work is concentrated there. It also means that matters in other areas — criminal proceedings, immigration, family law — are directed elsewhere clearly and quickly, without delay caused by attempting to manage them internally.
The comparison below describes the structural differences between these two models. The intent is not to suggest one is superior across all situations, but to allow a reader to understand where a focused practice of this kind is likely to serve them well.
General Practice vs Focused Advisory
| Area | General Practice Firm | Sekihi — Focused Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Broad range of legal matters — often including criminal, family, immigration, commercial and civil | Civil, corporate and property matters only. Matters outside this scope are identified and redirected clearly at first response |
| Initial Response | Varies; often requires an intake meeting or call before scope is confirmed | Written response within three working days confirming scope and next steps |
| Fee Structure | Hourly billing is common; total cost may not be confirmed until work is underway | Fixed fees stated at the outset. No changes without written notice in advance |
| Documentation | Varies by firm and matter; not always provided in written form at each stage | All advice given in writing. A record of obligations identified and steps recommended is provided at each stage |
| Engagement Length | Open-ended; often billed until matter concludes | Each engagement has a defined scope, timeline and endpoint stated before work begins |
| Out-of-Scope Matters | May attempt to handle or refer internally, which can extend timelines | Identified promptly and communicated clearly so the client can seek assistance without delay |
What a Focused Practice Offers Differently
Defined Engagement Terms
Before any work begins, Sekihi states in writing what is covered, what the fee is, and when the engagement ends. There is no ambiguity about what the client is agreeing to.
Written Records at Every Stage
Every piece of advice is documented. A client who needs to refer back to what was recommended six months earlier has a written record rather than a memory of a conversation.
Prompt Identification of Scope Limits
When a matter falls outside the areas Sekihi handles, this is communicated in the first response. The client is not kept waiting while internal discussions about capacity take place.
Fixed and Pre-Stated Fees
The fee for each service is stated before the engagement begins. A client considering whether to proceed has the full cost in front of them without needing to request an estimate.
Where Each Model Works Well
General Practice Firms
A general practice firm is well suited when:
- The matter spans multiple legal areas and requires coordination across departments
- Active legal proceedings require court representation
- The client relationship is long-standing and involves varied matters over many years
Sekihi — Focused Advisory
Sekihi is well suited when:
- The matter involves compliance, a business transfer, or intellectual property in a commercial context
- A defined scope, fixed fee and documented outcome is preferred over open-ended billing
- The client needs advice rather than representation and wants a written record of what was recommended
Cost and Value Perspective
Hourly billing at a general practice firm can be difficult to predict at the outset. The total cost of a matter is not always clear until it has concluded, which can make it harder to weigh whether to proceed.
Sekihi's services are priced as fixed engagements. The compliance documentation review is ¥40,000, the business transfer advice is ¥45,000 and the intellectual property protection service is ¥34,000. These are the full amounts — there are no additions without prior written notice.
For a company or individual who needs to know the cost before agreeing to proceed, this structure is more straightforward than an open billing arrangement. For matters that are likely to be complex, contentious or long-running, a general practice firm with the capacity to allocate time flexibly may be more appropriate.
The Client Experience Compared
Working With a General Practice Firm
Initial meeting or call to determine if the firm can assist, often before scope is confirmed
Matter handled by the assigned solicitor; larger matters may involve several people from the firm
Billing typically monthly against time recorded; total cost clarified at conclusion
The firm may manage the matter on the client's behalf with less direct involvement required
Working With Sekihi
Enquiry submitted by form; written response within three working days confirming scope and terms
Defined engagement with a stated timeline; the client knows what happens at each stage
Fixed fee agreed before work begins; no variation without prior written notice
Written advice provided at conclusion of each stage; the client retains a documented record
Longer-Term Considerations
Documentation as a Record
Written advice creates a reference point. If the same question arises again, or if circumstances change and the original advice needs to be revisited, the client has something to refer back to.
Predictable Cost
For a business managing a budget, knowing the full cost of a legal engagement before it begins allows for planning. Variable billing does not offer this, though it can be appropriate where the scope of a matter is genuinely uncertain.
Building a Compliance Record Over Time
For companies that commission a compliance review, the gap list and drafted policy text provided can be used in subsequent years to measure progress and demonstrate to third parties that obligations are being taken seriously.
Clear Referral When Out of Scope
Knowing that a matter outside Sekihi's scope will be identified quickly means a client does not lose time. A prompt, honest response allows them to seek appropriate assistance without delay.
Common Misunderstandings
Misunderstanding
"A focused practice will not be able to handle anything complex."
Clarification
Complexity within the defined scope is handled. The limitation is not on the difficulty of a matter but on its subject area. A complex compliance review or a layered business transfer falls within Sekihi's work.
Misunderstanding
"Fixed fees mean cut corners."
Clarification
A fixed fee reflects a defined scope, not reduced effort. Because the scope is stated clearly before work begins, the fee can be set accordingly. It is a structural choice, not an indication of reduced thoroughness.
Misunderstanding
"All legal advice should come from a single firm."
Clarification
Many businesses use different providers for different needs. A focused advisory engagement for compliance or IP matters does not preclude having a separate arrangement for other areas.
Misunderstanding
"Without representation, advice is not useful."
Clarification
Many legal needs are resolved by having documented, accurate advice in hand — the need for active representation is a further step that not every matter requires. Written advice can be acted upon directly.
Why a Focused Approach May Suit Your Situation
If your matter involves compliance documentation, a business transfer, or the protection of intellectual property, Sekihi's structure is suited to it. The scope is defined, the fee is stated at the outset, and the advice is given in writing.
If you are uncertain whether your matter falls within these areas, the enquiry form is the appropriate starting point. The first response will confirm scope without obligation, and if the matter is not one Sekihi handles, this will be communicated promptly so that you can seek assistance elsewhere without delay.
There is no commitment involved in making an enquiry.
Begin With an Enquiry
If the comparison above suggests that Sekihi may be suited to your matter, the contact form is the next step. A written response is provided within three working days.
Send an Enquiry